Register  

Founders' Truth on Facebook Founders' Truth on Twitter Founders' Truth on Flickr Founders' Truth on YouTube
You are hereHome  

The Freedom Blog



by Diane Rufino

On March 23, 1775, Patrick Henry delivered one of the most important speeches in our country's history. Attending a meeting of the Second Virginia Convention at St. John's Church in Richmond, Henry intended to present a proposal to organize a militia in every Virginia county. The Convention met at St. John's Church rather than the Capitol in Williamsburg because of opposition from England's Royal Governor Lord Dunmore and his Royal Marines.


The need for government, plain and simple, is because absolute freedom is impossible. However much we believe that freedom is the natural right of man, anarchy is not feasible in a world of evil and imperfect men. Governments, like those in the United States, are the intentional creations of free people. People mutually agree to transfer some of their rights to a governing body in order that they may live an ordered and more fruitful existence. Yes, they create governments so that liberty, in effect, can be enlarged. How is this possible? Consider how much freedom a person has who has to stay home to guard and protect his valuable property. He can't work successfully or travel freely. But police and fire departments can guard and protect his property on his behalf. In return, free people agree to be bound by the laws of government. And these laws, according to Natural law and natural rights, are specifically intended to prevent and punish bad conduct while promoting and rewarding good conduct.


Diane Rufino is a scientist and an attorney. She was born and raised in New Jersey and spent most of her life there. She got her B.S. from the University of Pennsylvania in Biochemistry, her M.S. in Pathology from Columbia University, and her law degree from Seton Hall University. Judge Andrew Napolitano, former NJ Superior Court judge and current FOX News Senior Legal Analyst, was her Constitutional Law professor. Diane knows DNA and she knows the Constitution. She is a leadership member of the Eastern NC Tea Party and Legislative Chair of the Republican Women of Pitt County. She writes often about the need to return to the productive values and principles that our Founding Fathers laid out for us. She stands for conservative and Christian values and believes what Patrick Henry told us: "The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people; It is an instrument for the people to restrain the government – lest it comes to dominate our lives and interests.” She strongly believes that if we continue to take God out of government, we will jeopardize the most precious of principles that our Founders gave us - that our rights come from God and as such, no government can take them away. Diane is married and has 4 wonderful children. It is because of them that she can put everything in life in proper perspective, including the importance of family, values, God, education, and love of country. They bring her joy and make her proud everyday.

Diane's blog sites: http://forloveofgodandcountry.wordpress.com
http://knowyourconstitution.wordpress.com




Blog Search
Tag Cloud

Greg's CornerWe the People

Where does sovereign power come from and to whom is it bestowed? In other words, from where does the government derive its power?

The short answer is that the government receives its power from the people. A common misperception is that America is a democracy. However, the truth is that the Founding Fathers established our country as a Constitutional Republic. In fact, the word “democracy” is not found in any of our founding documents or state constitutions.

Read more in We the People.

Past Essays

James Madison, 1822
"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives." 

John 14:6
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." 

Calvin Coolidge, Speech on 150th Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence
"About the Declaration [of Independence] there is a finality that is exceedingly restful. It is often asserted that the world has made a great deal of progress since 1776, that we have had new thoughts and new experiences which have given us a great advance over the people of that day, and that we may therefore very well discard their conclusions for something more modern. But that reasoning can not be applied to this great charter. If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers."